J J S & T U P E…’Plaining “Palestine”

So what’s that title referring to exactly…Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria & The Uttermost Parts of the Earth…referencing scripture & then Ex- (or perhaps Com-) Plaining “Palestine” or as I like to refer to it, so-called Palestine.

See the source image

Let’s start with scripture:

Acts 1: 4-9, King James Version

And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me.

For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence.

When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?

And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.

But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.

And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.


See the source image

This passage from the Book of Acts in the Holy Bible describes Jesus’ last moments on earth after His resurrection.  He had told his disciples to remain in Jerusalem so that they would be “baptized with the Holy Ghost” to enable them to be witnesses for Him “in Jerusalem…Judaea…Samaria & unto the uttermost part of the earth.”

Interestingly, just before He made this declaration his followers had asked Him if He would “at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel”.  This question seems to ring down through the ages & even in the current proposals by the Trump Administration to try to bring peace to the Middle East it is not a matter of restoring the kingdom of Israel…

See the source image

Here are some other verses that came up when searching for “the uttermost part of the earth” at Biblegateway.com

Psalm 2:7-8 King James Version (KJV)

I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.


See the source image

The below passage I will “edit” with bolding &/or italics:

Isaiah 24 King James Version (KJV)

24 Behold, the Lord maketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the inhabitants thereof.

And it shall be, as with the people, so with the priest; as with the servant, so with his master; as with the maid, so with her mistress; as with the buyer, so with the seller; as with the lender, so with the borrower; as with the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him.

The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the Lord hath spoken this word.

The earth mourneth and fadeth away, the world languisheth and fadeth away, the haughty people of the earth do languish.

5 The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant.

Therefore hath the curse devoured the earth, and they that dwell therein are desolate: therefore the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and few men left.

7 The new wine mourneth, the vine languisheth, all the merryhearted do sigh.

See the source image

The mirth of tabrets ceaseth, the noise of them that rejoice endeth, the joy of the harp ceaseth.

They shall not drink wine with a song; strong drink shall be bitter to them that drink it.

10 The city of confusion is broken down: every house is shut up, that no man may come in.

11 There is a crying for wine in the streets; all joy is darkened, the mirth of the land is gone.

12 In the city is left desolation, and the gate is smitten with destruction.

13 When thus it shall be in the midst of the land among the people, there shall be as the shaking of an olive tree, and as the gleaning grapes when the vintage is done.

14 They shall lift up their voice, they shall sing for the majesty of the Lord, they shall cry aloud from the sea.

15 Wherefore glorify ye the Lord in the fires, even the name of the Lord God of Israel in the isles of the sea.

16 From the uttermost part of the earth have we heard songs, even glory to the righteous. But I said, My leanness, my leanness, woe unto me! the treacherous dealers have dealt treacherously; yea, the treacherous dealers have dealt very treacherously.

17 Fear, and the pit, and the snare, are upon thee, O inhabitant of the earth.

18 And it shall come to pass, that he who fleeth from the noise of the fear shall fall into the pit; and he that cometh up out of the midst of the pit shall be taken in the snare: for the windows from on high are open, and the foundations of the earth do shake.

19 The earth is utterly broken down, the earth is clean dissolved, the earth is moved exceedingly.

20 The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage; and the transgression thereof shall be heavy upon it; and it shall fall, and not rise again.

21 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the Lord shall punish the host of the high ones that are on high, and the kings of the earth upon the earth.

22 And they shall be gathered together, as prisoners are gathered in the pit, and shall be shut up in the prison, and after many days shall they be visited.

23 Then the moon shall be confounded, and the sun ashamed, when the Lord of hosts shall reign in mount Zion, and in Jerusalem, and before his ancients gloriously.


King James Version (KJV)Public Domain


See the source image

Matthew 12:42

The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here.
See the source image

Mark 13: 23-37

23 But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things.

24 But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light,

25 And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.

26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.

See the source image

27 And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.

28 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When her branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is near:

29 So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors.

See the source image

30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.

31 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.

32 But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.

33 Take ye heed, watch and pray: for ye know not when the time is.

See the source image

34 For the Son of Man is as a man taking a far journey, who left his house, and gave authority to his servants, and to every man his work, and commanded the porter to watch.

35 Watch ye therefore: for ye know not when the master of the house cometh, at even, or at midnight, or at the cockcrowing, or in the morning:

36 Lest coming suddenly he find you sleeping.

37 And what I say unto you I say unto all, Watch.

King James Version (KJV)

Public Domain


See the source image

Well there is a Huge Amount of scriptural material there & I won’t attempt to unravel the many threads showing.  It appears that Jerusalem is key to some significant things, past, present, & future.  It remains the City of David & the place where God has put His Name.

See the source image

  • This current blog post adventure began when reading an intriguing blog post at the Q-Tree here–see the comments section there for a lively discussion & links to some of the tweets that apparently won’t post here please:


See the source image

This announcement lead to some lively discussions in our household that I hoped to simplify for my special needs son, who has a big heart for Israel & Jerusalem.  This lead to me looking up some historical AmericanThinker.com articles & blog posts surrounding this topic that I’ll share from below.  Also some of the maps in President Trump’s tweets sparked my curiosity in comparison to biblical maps…


Both of these maps can be found via this tweet:

Here is a typical distortion of the facts from the (terrorist) PLO:

What is really bizarre here is that when I try to post the source of the large maps above the PLO tweet disappears & then re-post the PLO tweet & the map tweet vanishes…hmm

In my opinion the Trumpian proposals for a future “Palestinian” State might be better served if they were more like “reservations” under Israeli authority & within Israel but semi-autonomous as long as they demonstrate the ability to manage their own affairs reasonably…

  • Here is a map & explanation from some of the Q-Treepers at the original post above

  1. There was a Jewish state in 1922 – and immediately – to try to make peace with the Arab Muslims – Israel gave up 77% of that land – a Two State Solution in 1922.

    Jewish Palestine was the land on the west of the Jordan river and Jewish Palestine was essentially the current nation of Jordan.

    In 1967, Arabs attacked Jewish Palestine, when it dared to claim nationhood and call itself Israel.

    Currently – Arabs are illegally occupying legal Israel in Gaza and West Bank and claim all of Israel as their legitimate land and do not want any Jewish state to exist. The Palestinian leaders are pretend victims, murderous terrorists, deceivers and provocateurs.

    Again – there has been a 2 State Solution since 1922 – and any plan that involves Israel giving up more land is an unjustice and has historically proved to be futile!

    In the past any Arab leader who signed a treaty with Israel was assassinated like Sadat. Time will tell.

    I think, in 1922, the land set aside for a Jewish homeland was administered by Great Britain . . . the British Mandate. The Brits, however, gave up 77% of that land to Hashemite Arabs, ostensibly because the Hashemites had helped in winning WWI. They had helped, but no that significantly. The real reasons the Brits gave the land to the Hashemites was because the Brits knew there was oil in the land and figured the Hashemites would be easier than the Jews to deal with for access to that oil, especially since it was the Brits who gave the Hashemites the land.

    Then when it came time to get serious about getting the Jew their homeland, the Brits, never really liking the Jews, decided that Arabs in the area also had a claim to the land, so they proposed to give half of that land to Arabs and half to the Jews. So, the Jews now are offered only 11 1/2% of the original land set aside for their homeland.

    Above all, the Jews wanted a homeland, so they took the deal, but the Arabs wanted more and didn’t take the deal. When the Jews established their homeland formally as the state of Israel in May 1948, every Arab country around them attacked. Fortunately, the Jews, though undermanned with outdated and few weapons, successfully defended Israel . . . through toughness, innovation, strategy, tactics, much sacrifice . . . and the will of God.


  1. Correction: Jewish Palestine was the land on the west of the Jordan river and ARAB Palestine was essentially the current nation of Jordan.

The first map is 1922 Jewish Palestine – after 77% of the British Mandate for the Jewish people was given to the Arabs – Jordan is Arab Palestine.

Moving all the Muslims out of Jewish Palestine – aka Israel – will be the only lasting solution.

Perhaps more akin to the Final Solution from the 1930’s & 1940’s…God Forbid!!!


Gaza is the ancient land of the Philistines – it’s been a scourge upon the Jewish people – physically and spiritually – since the time of the 12 tribes of Israel…

  • Here are the President’s tweets on this topic:


  • Here is a map of the Biblical division of the Promised Land to the 12 Tribes of Israel

See the source image

I found this image from a bing.com search for biblical maps, here’s a page with that map & further explanation:


Here is another version

Israel during the time of the Judges:

Calling this map “Palestine” is, in my opinion, a distortion, other than in the title, “Palestine” does not appear on this map:

  • Israel in the year 2000:

See the source image

See the source image

See the source image

See the source image

See the source image

  • Here is the only KJV mention of the word “Palestine”:

Joel 3:3-5 King James Version (KJV)

And they have cast lots for my people; and have given a boy for an harlot, and sold a girl for wine, that they might drink.

Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Palestine? will ye render me a recompence? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompence upon your own head;

Because ye have taken my silver and my gold, and have carried into your temples my goodly pleasant things:

King James Version (KJV)Public Domain

See the source image

After searching the word “Palestine” in the NIV & getting nothing I searched the above verse in the available English translations & will Bold those that use “Palestine”, at BibleGateway.com:

JOEL 3:4

Yea, and what have ye to do with Me, O Tyre and Sidon and all the coasts of Palestine? Will ye render Me a recompense? And if ye recompense Me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompense upon your own head,
Yea, and what are ye to me, O Tyre, and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? will ye render me a recompense? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompense upon your own head.
Moreover, what are you to Me, O Tyre and Sidon and all the [five small] regions of Philistia? Will you pay Me back for something [I have supposedly done to you]? Even if you do pay Me back, I will swiftly and speedily return your deed [of retaliation] on your own head.
Yes, and what are you to Me, O Tyre and Sidon and all the [five small] divisions of Philistia? Will you pay Me back for something? Even if you pay Me back, swiftly and speedily I will return your deed [of retaliation] upon your own head,
Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Palestine? will ye render me a recompence? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompence upon your own head;
And also: Tyre, Sidon, and all the territories of Philistia—what are you to me? Are you paying me back or trying to get even with me? I will quickly bring retribution on your heads.
What are you to me, Tyre and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something? If you are paying me back, then in a flash I will turn your deeds back upon your own heads.
The sun will be turned into darkness and the moon into blood before the coming of the great and terrible Day of Adonai.”
You people of Tyre and Sidon and you Philistines, why are you doing this? Are you trying to get even with me? I’ll strike back before you know what’s happened.
Yea also, what have ye to do with me, O Tyre and Zidon, and all the districts of Philistia? Will ye render me a recompence? But if ye recompense me, swiftly [and] speedily will I bring your recompence upon your own head;
But what have you to do with me, O Tyre, and Sidon, and all the coast of the Philistines? will you revenge yourselves on me? and if you revenge yourselves on me, I will very soon return you a recompense upon your own head.
“Tyre! Sidon! All of you areas of Philistia! You are not important to me! Are you punishing me for something I did? You might think that you are punishing me, but I will soon punish you.
Tell me, what do you have against me, Tyre and Sidon, and all you regions of Philistia? Are you repaying me for something I have done? If you are paying me back, I will swiftly and speedily repay onto your own heads what you have done,
“What are you to me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something? If you are paying me back, I will return your payment on your own head swiftly and speedily.
“What are you to me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something? If you are paying me back, I will return your payment on your own head swiftly and speedily.
“Tyre and Sidon and all of you regions of Philistia! What did you have against me? Were you ·punishing me [paying me back; taking vengeance] for something I did, ·or were you doing something to hurt me? [or If you were trying to pay me back,] I will very quickly ·do to you [L return on your heads] what you have done to me.
Yea, and what have you to do with me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the coasts of Philistia? will ye render me a recompense? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I render your recompense upon your head:
“Now what do you have against me, Tyre and Sidon and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something I have done? If you are paying me back, I will quickly pay you back for what you have done.
“What are you trying to do to me, Tyre, Sidon, and all of Philistia? Are you trying to pay me back for something? If you are, I will quickly pay you back!
And also: Tyre, Sidon, and all the territories of Philistia—what are you to Me? Are you paying Me back or trying to get even with Me? I will quickly bring retribution on your heads.
“Tyre and Sidon and all of you regions of Philistia! What do you have against me? Are you punishing me for something I did? Or are you doing something to hurt me? Then I will quickly do to you what you have done to me.
“Furthermore, what have you to do with me, Tyre, Sidon, and all the sea coasts of Philistia? Are you taking revenge on me? If you are taking revenge on me, I’ll send it back on you swiftly and promptly,
Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Philistia? will ye render me a recompense? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily I will return your recompense upon your own head;
Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Palestine? will ye render me a recompence? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompence upon your own head;
Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Palestine? will ye render me a recompence? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompence upon your own head;
What are you to me, O Tyre and O Sidon, and all of the regions of Philistia? Are you repaying to me what is deserved? If you are recompensing me, I will return swiftly and quickly what you deserve on your head!
Tyre and Sidon, don’t you try to interfere! Are you trying to take revenge on me, you cities of Philistia? Beware, for I will strike back swiftly and return the harm to your own heads.
“As for you, Tyre and Sidon and Philistia, why should I bother with you? Are you trying to get back at me for something I did to you? If you are, forget it. I’ll see to it that it boomerangs on you. You robbed me, cleaned me out of silver and gold, carted off everything valuable to furnish your own temples. You sold the people of Judah and Jerusalem into slavery to the Greeks in faraway places. But I’m going to reverse your crime. I’m going to free those slaves. I’ll have done to you what you did to them: I’ll sell your children as slaves to your neighbors, And they’ll sell them to the far-off Sabeans.” God’s Verdict.
Also, what are you to Me, Tyre and Sidon and all the regions of Philistia? Are you repaying Me for something? If you are repaying Me, I will return your payment swiftly and speedily on your head.
“Now what do you have against me, Tyre and Sidon and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something I have done? If you are paying me back, I will quickly pay you back for what you have done.
The sun will darken, the moon turn blood-red, Before the day of the Lord arrives, that great and terrible day.
Moreover, what are you to Me, O Tyre, Sidon and all the regions of Philistia? Are you rendering Me a recompense? But if you do recompense Me, swiftly and speedily I will return your recompense on your head.
“Tyre and Sidon and all of you regions of Philistia! What did you have against me? Were you punishing me for something I did, or were you doing something to hurt me? I will very quickly do to you what you have done to me.
Why are you doing these things to me, Tyre and Sidon? Are you trying to get even with me, land of Philistia? If you are, I will very quickly repay you for what you have done!
“Tyre and Sidon, why are you doing things like that to me? And why are you doing them, all you people in Philistia? Are you trying to get even with me for something I have done? If you are, I will pay you back for it in a quick and speedy way.
“Now what have you against me, Tyre and Sidon and all you regions of Philistia? Are you repaying me for something I have done? If you are paying me back, I will swiftly and speedily return on your own heads what you have done.
‘Now what have you against me, Tyre and Sidon and all you regions of Philistia? Are you repaying me for something I have done? If you are paying me back, I will swiftly and speedily return on your own heads what you have done.
“Indeed, what have you to do with Me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the coasts of Philistia? Will you retaliate against Me? But if you retaliate against Me, Swiftly and speedily I will return your retaliation upon your own head;
What are you to Me, O Tyre, Sidon, and all the lands of Philistia? Are you paying Me back for something? If you are, I will be quick to pay you back!
“What do you have against me, Tyre and Sidon and you cities of Philistia? Are you trying to take revenge on me? If you are, then watch out! I will strike swiftly and pay you back for everything you have done.
What are you to me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something? If you are paying me back, I will turn your deeds back upon your own heads swiftly and speedily.
What are you to me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something? If you are paying me back, I will turn your deeds back upon your own heads swiftly and speedily.
What are you to me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something? If you are paying me back, I will turn your deeds back upon your own heads swiftly and speedily.
What are you to me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something? If you are paying me back, I will turn your deeds back upon your own heads swiftly and speedily.
Yea, and what have ye to do with Me, O Tzor, and Tzidon, and all the coasts of Peleshet? Will ye render Me a pay-back? And if ye recompense Me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompense upon your own rosh;
“What are you to me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something? If you are paying me back, I will requite your deed upon your own head swiftly and speedily.
“What are you to me, O Tyre and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Are you paying me back for something? If you are paying me back, I will requite your deed upon your own head swiftly and speedily.
The sun will be turned into darkness and the moon into blood, before the great and awesome day of Adonai comes.
Tyre, Sidon, and all the districts of Philistia, what do you have against Me? Are you trying to get back at Me? Do you pay me back? I will turn your wicked actions back upon your heads, fast and sure.
“Yes, and what are you to me, Tyre, and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Will you repay me? And if you repay me, I will swiftly and speedily return your repayment on your own head.
But what to me and to you, thou Tyre, and Sidon, and each end of Palestine? Whether ye shall yield venging to me? and if ye venge you against me, soon swiftly I shall yield while to you on(to) your head. (But what be you to me, O Tyre, and Sidon, and all of Philistia? Shall ye avenge yourselves against me? if ye do avenge yourselves against me, soon and swiftly I shall turn back your despicable deeds upon your own heads.)
And also, what [are] ye to Me, O Tyre and Zidon, And all circuits of Philistia? Recompence are ye rendering unto Me? And if ye are giving recompence to Me, Swiftly, hastily, I turn back your recompence on your head.
21st Century King James Version (KJ21) Copyright © 1994 by Deuel Enterprises, Inc.; American Standard Version (ASV) Public Domain (Why are modern Bible translations copyrighted?); Amplified Bible (AMP) Copyright © 2015 by The Lockman Foundation, La Habra, CA 90631. All rights reserved.; Amplified Bible, Classic Edition (AMPC) Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation; BRG Bible (BRG) Blue Red and Gold Letter Edition™ Copyright © 2012 BRG Bible Ministries. Used by Permission. All rights reserved. BRG Bible is a Registered Trademark in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office #4145648; Christian Standard Bible (CSB) The Christian Standard Bible. Copyright © 2017 by Holman Bible Publishers. Used by permission. Christian Standard Bible®, and CSB® are federally registered trademarks of Holman Bible Publishers, all rights reserved. ; Common English Bible (CEB) Copyright © 2011 by Common English Bible; Complete Jewish Bible (CJB) Copyright © 1998 by David H. Stern. All rights reserved. ; Contemporary English Version (CEV) Copyright © 1995 by American Bible Society; Darby Translation (DARBY) Public Domain (Why are modern Bible translations copyrighted?); Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition (DRA) Public Domain (Why are modern Bible translations copyrighted?); Easy-to-Read Version (ERV) Copyright © 2006 by Bible League International; Evangelical Heritage Version (EHV) The Holy Bible, Evangelical Heritage Version®, EHV®, © 2019 Wartburg Project, Inc. All rights reserved.; English Standard Version (ESV) The Holy Bible, English Standard Version. ESV® Text Edition: 2016. Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers.; English Standard Version Anglicised (ESVUK) The Holy Bible, English Standard Version Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers.; Expanded Bible (EXB) The Expanded Bible, Copyright © 2011 Thomas Nelson Inc. All rights reserved. ; 1599 Geneva Bible (GNV) Geneva Bible, 1599 Edition. Published by Tolle Lege Press. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without written permission from the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations in articles, reviews, and broadcasts. ; GOD’S WORD Translation (GW) Copyright © 1995 by God’s Word to the Nations. Used by permission of God’s Word Mission Society.; Good News Translation (GNT) Copyright © 1992 by American Bible Society; Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) Copyright © 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2009 by Holman Bible Publishers, Nashville Tennessee. All rights reserved.; International Children’s Bible (ICB) The Holy Bible, International Children’s Bible® Copyright© 1986, 1988, 1999, 2015 by Tommy Nelson™, a division of Thomas Nelson. Used by permission.; International Standard Version (ISV) Copyright © 1995-2014 by ISV Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED INTERNATIONALLY. Used by permission of Davidson Press, LLC.; Jubilee Bible 2000 (JUB) Copyright © 2000, 2001, 2010 by Life Sentence Publishing, Inc.; King James Version (KJV) Public Domain; Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV) KJV reproduced by permission of Cambridge University Press, the Crown’s patentee in the UK.; Lexham English Bible (LEB) 2012 by Logos Bible Software. Lexham is a registered trademark of Logos Bible Software; Living Bible (TLB) The Living Bible copyright © 1971 by Tyndale House Foundation. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois 60188. All rights reserved.; The Message (MSG) Copyright © 1993, 2002, 2018 by Eugene H. Peterson; Modern English Version (MEV) The Holy Bible, Modern English Version. Copyright © 2014 by Military Bible Association. Published and distributed by Charisma House. ; Names of God Bible (NOG) The Names of God Bible (without notes) © 2011 by Baker Publishing Group. ; New American Bible (Revised Edition) (NABRE) Scripture texts, prefaces, introductions, footnotes and cross references used in this work are taken from the New American Bible, revised edition © 2010, 1991, 1986, 1970 Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Inc., Washington, DC All Rights Reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. ; New American Standard Bible (NASB) Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation; New Century Version (NCV) The Holy Bible, New Century Version®. Copyright © 2005 by Thomas Nelson, Inc.; New English Translation (NET) NET Bible® copyright ©1996-2017 by Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. http://netbible.com All rights reserved.; New International Reader’s Version (NIRV) Copyright © 1995, 1996, 1998, 2014 by Biblica, Inc.®. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.; New International Version (NIV) Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.; New International Version – UK (NIVUK) Holy Bible, New International Version® Anglicized, NIV® Copyright © 1979, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.; New King James Version (NKJV) Scripture taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson. Used by permission. All rights reserved.; New Life Version (NLV) Copyright © 1969, 2003 by Barbour Publishing, Inc.; New Living Translation (NLT) Holy Bible, New Living Translation, copyright © 1996, 2004, 2015 by Tyndale House Foundation. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois 60188. All rights reserved.; New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright © 1989 the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.; New Revised Standard Version, Anglicised (NRSVA) New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition, copyright © 1989, 1995 the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.; New Revised Standard Version, Anglicised Catholic Edition (NRSVACE) New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Catholic Edition, copyright © 1989, 1993, 1995 the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.; New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (NRSVCE) New Revised Standard Version Bible: Catholic Edition, copyright © 1989, 1993 the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.; Orthodox Jewish Bible (OJB) Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2008, 2010, 2011 by Artists for Israel International; Revised Standard Version (RSV) Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1946, 1952, and 1971 the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.; Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE) The Revised Standard Version of the Bible: Catholic Edition, copyright © 1965, 1966 the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.; Tree of Life Version (TLV) Tree of Life (TLV) Translation of the Bible. Copyright © 2015 by The Messianic Jewish Family Bible Society.; The Voice (VOICE) The Voice Bible Copyright © 2012 Thomas Nelson, Inc. The Voice™ translation © 2012 Ecclesia Bible Society All rights reserved. ; World English Bible (WEB) by Public Domain. The name “World English Bible” is trademarked.; Wycliffe Bible (WYC) 2001 by Terence P. Noble; Young’s Literal Translation (YLT) by Public Domain
See the source image

As you can see from the passages above the word is usually Philistia (or Philistines), rarely “Palestine” & once Peleshet….so this would tend to point to the word “Palestine” being another word for Philistine or Philistia…

See the source image

Basically none of the maps above show a place “Palestine” even on maps that carry that word in the title.  Many refer to Philistines or Philistia as the Philistine peoples did continually plague God’s Chosen People, Israel/Judah…

See the source image

So now I’ll turn to that AmericanThinker.com search for further understanding & insights on this issue in an historical context, as articulated by a number of conservative authors, in attempted chronological order, text selections only:


  • Here is the 1st article for consideration:

“Old” Europe and Israel

It was in this moral and intellectual climate that Israel, in an act of existential desperation, responded to declarations of imminent attack and to closing of the straits of Tirana to Israeli shipping by a lightning strike in 1967. To the Americans, unburdened by suppressed guilt of imperialism, nothing was off. To the new-generation, fair-minded Europeans, however, it was a fresh reminder of the wrong ways of Europe’s colonial past. What Europeans were trying to forget and heal, or at best suppress into the unconscious, they saw re-enacted in broad daylight. In what to Israel was as a mere act of self-defense, the good people of Europe saw a repetition of precisely what had been repudiated by the long history of European colonialism. To Europeans, Israel was actively engaged in the behavior that Europe became deeply ashamed of, and tried diligently to redress by de-colonization and aid. (That perception was also fed by a sheer ignorance of history: Europeans failed to realize that all “Arab lands” outside of the Arabian peninsula were gained through conquest, and therefore had previous owners, and that the Arabs were just as imperialistic as were the Europeans. Illogically, while they took a position of supported “natives” against “invaders” all over the world, they made one exception for Israel. European “intellectuals” are a rather surprisingly ignorant lot.)
Donald Rumsfeld’s distinction between “old” and the “new” Europe, which galled Europeans so much and made him such a hated figure across the Atlantic, is fundamentally sound. Eastern Europe, which did not participate in colonialism – but was, in fact, itself colonized by the Soviets, has a very different psyche, and much fewer demons to fight, than many western European countries, and so can be much closer to the US on many issues, Israel including.
European attitude to Israel is, first and foremost, a product of the “old” Europe’s past – of those aspects of it, in fact, that have nothing to do with anti-Semitism or Jews. Israel is an irritant to the Europeans, because it unintentionally reminds them of so much of perceived wrongs in the “old” Europe’s past.
This is a link to this author’s articles at AT:


  • Here is the 2nd article to consider:




Israel’s Siege Continues


The on again, off again peace process with the Palestinians, begun in 1993, has now deteriorated to a new low with the current escalation in fighting between Israel and Hamas. Israel removed all of its settlers and armed forces from Gaza in the summer of 2005.  Philanthropists, including Bill and Melinda Gates, provided the money to purchase the Israeli greenhouses in Gaza to turn them over to the Palestinians upon the Israelis’ disengagement from Gaza, so that an enormously productive agricultural business could form the  basis of a new Palestinian national economy in the Gaza Strip. Turn over the greenhouses  is exactly what the Palestinians did, in the first days after the Israelis  left,  destroying or removing virtually every usable piece of machinery and equipment, either for scrap,  or as a futile angry gesture against the former Israeli occupation.

And finally, just as with the withdrawal from Lebanon, Israel mistakenly assumed that once Gaza was entirely Palestinian, at least the occupation of Gaza was one Palestinian grievance that was eliminated. But since the Israeli withdrawal, the Palestinians have fired  over 5000 rockets at Sderot, and Ashkelon, and other towns in the Negev, 600 so far this year in but two months. The rockets now have improved accuracy and longer range, and various terror groups in Gaza are trumpeting that they now have chemical weapons to use against Israel as well. 


What other country in the world would behave with the restraint Israel has shown at these daily attacks directed at its citizens?  On Wednesday and Thursday last week last, 90 rockets were fired at Israel, a one day record, two of them barely missing a school and a hospital in Ashkelon. On Wednesday, a college student and father of four was killed by a rocket in Sderot. Despite all this, it is Israel which is defamed in the court of international opinion for its alleged collective punishment of Gaza, and “disproportionate” response to the rocket fire,  not Hamas for its ongoing war directed at Israeli civilians.

Alone among the states of the world, Israel is not assured of its continued existence.  We do not need to discuss whether New Zealand or Ghana have a right to exist and whether they will continue to exist. Palestinians and their Arab allies have always suspected that at some point, Israelis will tire of the fight, or just as effective from their perspective, they can wean America away from its support for Israel, which will make Israelis realize the precariousness of their situation and their total international isolation. The expectation is that Israel will then, over time, make disastrous political concessions —  choosing the false hope of a Palestinian peace partner over the reality of the continuing siege, and these will lead to a weakening of Israel’s strategic capability, and finally the  defeat or collapse of the state.  How today can Israel negotiate with the Abbas government, when the PA does not control Gaza and has no say over the 40% of the Palestinian population which lives there?


How do you make peace, when 60 years after the 1948 war, over a million Palestinians live in refugee camps, and are told that they will return to their homes  in Israel. Does it matter that more than 95% of the so-called refugees have never stepped foot in Israel and are the second, third and fourth generation descendants of original refugees from the 1948 war, most of whom left at  the direction of invading  Arab armies or sensibly fled a war zone? Israel, on the other hand absorbed a Jewish refugee community driven out of the Arab countries in the years following  the 1948 war equivalent in size to the Arab refugees from the ’48 war. None of them, however,  remained in refugee camps for long years after they came to Israel. They became  Israelis.


The Palestinians have never cared a whit for the human rights or living conditions of their refugees. Rather, the goal was to maintain an angry disenfranchised population, one that would never settle for anything but a full right of return. The hope was to overwhelm Israel with Palestinians, at which point Israeli Jews would see the bleakness of their demographic future and begin to leave. The current Palestinian call for a one state solution (a multi-ethnic Palestine dominated by the Arabs), has an identical goal — and does not require the movement of the Palestinian population to realize its goal.

In the decades following the Holocaust , many Jews asked themselves what they and their country could have done differently to have prevented the extermination of six million of our people or to have lessened the toll.  We do not want to have to undertake such soul searching again. So I urge you to engage with Israel’s struggle, and to help provide the political, strategic and personal support to insure that they, who are on the front line,  are never alone as the siege continues.

Here is a link to more posts by this author at AT (there are more options of him writing with others in the right column at this link):
  • Here is the 3rd article to consider:

The UN’s Orwellian Language on Israel

Underlying the ideologically-driven hatred of the Middle East’s only democracy is a deadly Orwellian vocabulary which defines Israel as a pariah nation, a rogue state, an aggressive, murderous regime which is ethnically cleaning Palestine of its perennially-suffering third-world victims. Even the title of this wildly productive “emergency session” is coded with lies and distortions that help the Council reinforce Israel’s perceived role as the world’s most militaristic force and the greatest threat to world peace.

University of Bremen’s Professor Gunnar Heinsohn and Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum, for instance, recently compiled statistics on all world conflicts with an excess of 10,000 deaths since 1950, just after Israeli was created. Despite the libelous accusations of the Council, the statistics show that a number of other bloody conflicts actually deserve the designation of “genocide,” massacre,” or even “holocaust,” and that the total, though still tragic, number of deaths of Arabs and Jews in Palestine over a tumultuous 58-year period totals 51,000-only the forty-ninth most deadly conflict.

So while the significance of the Israeli/Arab conflict looms large in the world’s imagination, Heinsohn and Pipes note that the total deaths there “amount to just 0.06 percent of the total number of deaths in all conflicts in that period. More graphically, only 1 out of about 1,700 persons killed in conflicts since 1950 has died due to Arab-Israeli fighting,” indicating that neither the particularity of that conflict nor the lethality qualify it for the obsessive attention Israel’s detractors are fond of heaping on it.
More revealing, as the two study authors report, is that Muslim deaths disproportionately occur at he hands of co-religionists, that while “some 11,000,000 Muslims have been violently killed since 1948, of which 35,000, or 0.3 percent, died during the sixty years of fighting Israel, or just 1 out of every 315 Muslim fatalities . . , over 90 percent of the 11 million who perished were killed by fellow Muslims.”
Here is a link to further articles by this autho at AT:
  • Here’s the 4th article to consider filled w/ much historic detail:

Gaza’s Rich Jewish History

In the Second millennium BC, Gaza served as an administrative city and residence of the Egyptian governor of Canaan. The bible tells us that the Jewish patriarch, Isaac, dug wells in Gerar, an ancient site between Beer Sheba and Gaza, and in the 13th century BC the Philistines or Caphorites (Cretans) annihilated the Avite inhabitants of Gaza and made the city the largest of their five centers. After the Israelite Exodus from Egypt and entry into the Promised Land, the tribe of Judah was given Gaza as a possession but did not include it fully in their territory. The bible reports in Joshua 15.47 and Judges 1:18 how the city of Gaza, and those of Ekron, Ashkelon, Ashdod and Gat became a possession of Israel but how some of them were among those places ‘lying in the remaining country,’ i.e., not fully possessed by the Israelites.

In 167 BC, Judah Maccabee led his Jewish fighters to victory over the Syrian-Greek pagan king, Antiochus Epiphanies.  Jerusalem was liberated and the defiled Temple cleansed. The miracle of this event is now celebrated by Jews during the festival of Hanukah. But it was the Hasmonean king, Yochanan, who liberated Gaza in 145 BC. He was the brother of Judah the Maccabee and it was their other brother, Simon, who sent Jews to repopulate Gaza and its environs.
In the Book of Maccabees: 1:15, it says:
“Not a strange land have we conquered, and not over the possessions of strangers have we ruled, but of the inheritance of our Fathers that was in the hands of the enemy and conquered by them unlawfully. And as for us, when we had the chance, we returned to ourselves the inheritance of our Fathers.”

Under the subsequent harsh Byzantine rule, Gaza’s restored Jewish community nevertheless managed to flourish and during the 4th century Gaza served as the primary port of commerce for the Jews of the Holy Land.
It is interesting to note that in 1967, archaeologists discovered the beautiful mosaic floor of a 6th century synagogue situated on the Gaza seashore, attesting to the size and prominence of the Jewish community of the time.

The great scholar, Rabbi Yaakov Emden, ruled centuries ago that Gaza is an intrinsic part of the Jewish people’s national heritage. “Gaza and its environs are absolutely considered part of the Land of Israel,” he wrote in his work, Mor U’ketziyah, adding, “there is no doubt that it is a mitzvah (commandment and blessing) to live there, as in any other part of the Land of Israel.”
Over the millennia Jews have been expelled from Gaza by many different conquerors but have always managed to return. The Crusaders killed many Gazan Jews, leaving few survivors. Ottoman Turks ruled a vast empire from 1517 to 1917, including the geographical backwater known as Palestine. They also frequently expelled the Jewish residents but then allowed them to return. This pattern has continued for centuries.

In an election pushed by Condoleezza Rice, the Palestinian Arabs in Gaza voted eagerly for Hamas and against Fatah knowing full well that Hamas fundamentalist ideology calls for the destruction of Israel or any non-Muslim state existing in territory previously conquered in the name of Allah. Hamas will thus never live in peace with Israel, a Jewish state, even though the Jews are the indigenous and native people of the region and predate Islam by millennia. 
Will the pattern that has existed for thousands of years continue; a sequence of Jewish exile from Gaza, followed by inevitable restoration? Those Jews who were driven out by the Israeli government of Ariel Sharon and his successor, Ehud Olmert, now wait as refugees for the opportunity to again return.
One such Israeli refugee from Gaza, Rachel Saperstein, addressed the Jerusalem Conference recently held in Israel. Now 68 years of age, she lives with her husband, a disabled terror victim, in a run down camp along with five hundred other Jewish families driven from their homes located throughout the Gaza Strip.
In her speech, she lamented that not a thing now grows in the village she was forced to abandon during the Disengagement Plan. The greenhouses that were given freely to the Palestinian Arabs have largely been trashed but those still in use yield nothing.
“We know the reason why,” she suggests. “Only when the Jews return to their land will the land bring forth its bounty. No Israeli government is to give away any of our land ever again … This is my message.”
Despite Gaza’s rich Jewish history little is known of it to most people. The events unfolding today in Gaza now take preeminence, clouding perceptions that might otherwise be better shaped through the historical perspective of millennia.


Here are 2 links to further articles by this exceptional author at AT!



  • The 5th excerpt below is really a MUST READ for perspective!!!


A Two State Solution – on both sides of the River Jordan


Shortly after the conclusion of the First World War and the total defeat of the Turkish Ottoman Empire, which had ruled most of the Middle East for 400 years, Britain was made trustee by the League of Nations for the whole of the geographical area known as Mandatory Palestine. Incorporated within the Mandate was the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which specifically referred to the historical connections of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the moral validity of reconstituting within it the Jewish National Home.


The British Mandatory power, however, arbitrarily tore away 80% of the Palestine Mandate in 1921 giving it to the Hashemites, a Bedouin tribe with links to Mecca. Only the land west of the River Jordan remained from the original territory promised to the Jewish people as a National Home.


Jewish residency was immediately forbidden in all the lands east of the River Jordan, which in time became known as Trans-Jordan and then as the Kingdom of Jordan.


The U.N. Partition Plan of 1947 created two states, Jewish and Arab, which were roughly equal in size. But these two states were to occupy only the remaining western geographic area of Mandatory Palestine – from the Mediterranean Sea to the River Jordan – barely 50 miles wide and a mere 20% of what now remained of Mandatory Palestine. 


This plan was accepted by the Jewish leadership with deep reservations but as a pragmatic solution to the plight of the 850,000 Jewish refugees who were being driven from Arab lands at the time of Israel’s rebirth.


The miniscule size of the state was also reluctantly accepted in order to facilitate the absorption of the surviving Jewish remnant still languishing in the European refugee camps following the Holocaust.


The State of Israel, thus reconstituted in part of its ancient and biblical homeland in May, 1948, was immediately invaded by seven Arab armies in order to completely destroy it and drive the surviving Jews into the sea.


The Jordanian Arab Legion, led by British officers, occupied the eastern half of Jerusalem along with Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), driving the Jews out of their towns and villages. In the south, the Egyptians occupied the Gaza Strip, similarly driving the Jews from their homes.


The Jewish state astonished the world by surviving the Arab aggression. The Arab states, however, totally rejected the existence of a Jewish state in the Middle East and an uneasy armistice remained in force routinely broken by acts of Arab terror. 


In June, 1967, the Egyptians, Jordanians and Syrians, launched a new aggression against Israel with the avowed intention of annihilating it. Israel defeated her Arab enemies in six amazing days and in so doing liberated the eastern half of Jerusalem, along with Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), from the Jordanians. At the same time, Gaza was freed from Egyptian occupation.


Despite subsequent and repeated offers by Israeli governments to give away territory in return for a true and lasting peace with the Arab belligerents, the Arab world continued to support terror and refused to accept a Jewish state within the Middle East.


Interestingly in April, 2009, the Holocaust denying leader of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, Israel’s supposed peace partner, rejected any willingness to accept Israel as a Jewish state; a sure indication of the falsity of any Arab claim to live in full and lasting peace with Israel.
True, a peace exists today between Israel and Jordan and between Israel and Egypt but it is a frigid, cold and precarious peace with neither Jordan nor Egypt truly interested in full and mutually beneficial relations. Thus ends the history lesson.


The creation of a Palestinian Arab state within the mere 50 miles separating the Mediterranean and the Jordan River is a recipe for war and for the piecemeal destruction of the Jewish state. Such an Arab state will more than likely soon fall under the control of the Islamist Hamas movement, itself a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which seeks a worldwide Islamic Caliphate. Gaza, and what is has become, is living proof.


The Iranian mullahs, perhaps now armed with nuclear weapons, will have a command and control base within the territory given away to the Arabs. They will be ensconced in Gaza on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea, interested in launching ever more lethal terror against what is left of Israel and threatening Europe. 


Israel will again be reduced to a nation a mere nine miles wide at its most populous region. When President Bush was still Governor of Texas he flew over Israel’s tiny width and remarked, “…why, in my state we have driveways longer than that.”


That is the most likely outcome of the current proposed Two State Solution west of the Jordan River, which the Obama Administration is pushing with the flawed zeal of a misguided zealot. But to truly create a just and equitable solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, I propose a Two State Solution on both sides of the River Jordan.


To repeat: The present day Kingdom of Jordan occupies four-fifths of geographical Palestine. This territory consists of the land east of the River Jordan, extending north to Syria, east to Iraq and south to Saudi-Arabia.


Compared to Israel, it dwarfs the Jewish state yet it originated in an act of unprincipled perfidiousness by the British government of the day and remains an Arab state that has from its inception forbidden Jewish habitation within its borders, even though it includes territory promised in Britain’s 1917 Balfour Declaration and by the League of Nations as a Jewish National Home.                                      


Jordan’s population is currently made up of 75% Arabs who call themselves Palestinians with the remainder being Hashemite Bedouins. As it is exists on land originally forming four fifths of Mandatory Palestine, and as the population is three fourths Palestinian Arab, it follows that the “just and equitable” solution to the creation of a Palestinian Arab state should be within the present day Kingdom of Jordan and, therefore, east of the River Jordan.


The Arabs who call themselves Palestinians and who choose to remain in Judea and Samaria should be required to end all terrorism against Israel – hardly an onerous demand – and by finally living in peace could flourish within an Israel whose territory would now formally extend west from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. That would still only be a distance of barely 50 miles at its widest. The United States in comparison is some 3,000 miles wide.


Israel would now formally give up 80% of the originally mandated territory but would now possess all of her biblical and ancestral Jewish lands – with the exception of biblical Gilead east of the Jordan River, which is in present day north-western Jordan.


If there is a desire within the international community to truly arrive at a “just and equitable” solution, then this would be it. Of course, if this was a perfect world, it would satisfy historical, geographical, religious and ethnic considerations. But, alas, it is anything but a perfect world and the fanatical desire among so many Arab and Muslim nations to wipe out all vestiges of a Jewish state is, perhaps, insurmountable. 
  • Here is the 6th article to consider:

The ‘Rape’ of Israel

I won’t quote from this article as the focus isn’t so much on the history as of the assualt like nature of the Obama Administrations approach to the Israeli-Palestinian issue…

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • The 7th article for consideration is & is worth reading the entire article:

Wrong use of the ‘P word’

Christian and even Jewish writers, many eminent and admirable, often use the word Palestine along with or even instead of Israel, Judea and Judah when referring to the biblical period. This, consciously or unwittingly, helps to belittle the inextricable links of the Jewish people to their biblical and ancestral homeland.
It is time to restore historical correctness and dispose, once and for all, of the literary and present day propagandistic use of the term Palestine when referring to the biblical period.
Nowhere in the Jewish Bible is the word Palestine used. Nor is it ever used in the Christian Bible. Read the New Testament texts and look for the word, Palestine. It does not exist. But Israel is used. For instance in Matt. 2:20-21:
And he arose and took the young child and his mother, and came into the Land of Israel.
The Bible, both Jewish and Christian, never employs the name Palestine in reference to biblical times. Any Bible commentary that refers to the biblical period as ‘in Palestine’ is either committing an historical error or is making a determined and sinister effort to deny the Jewish biblical names of Judah, Israel, Judea, Samaria and Galilee – especially that of Israel. It is, therefore, necessary to review some brief history to understand the monumental error being committed.
During the First Jewish uprising against the Romans, the Roman general, Titus, destroyed the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 AD. Subsequently Rome issued coins with the phrase, Judea Capta, meaning that the Jewish province of Judea had been captured. However, they did not use the term, Palestine, for it was as yet unknown and certainly never employed in Roman coinage of that time.
The second Jewish Revolt against Roman occupation of Judea broke out under the banner of Bar-Kochba in 132 AD. It was eventually crushed in 136 AD after years of heroic resistance against the legions of Rome’s emperor, Hadrian Publius Aelius.
Incidentally, a discovery of 120 coins minted by followers of Bar Kochba, who was known as the Son of a Star, have just been found by Israeli archaeologists near the Dead Sea where the Jewish defenders made their final stand against Rome. The coins all had the words, ‘Freedom for Jerusalem’ imprinted on them.
It is intriguing to consider that if the British tribes, at the other end of the empire, had risen in revolt at the same time, both peoples may have prevailed and history would be very different from what it became.
Hadrian destroyed Jewish Jerusalem, plowing the city under and filling the furrows with salt. He renamed it Aelia Capitolina, in part after his own name, and built a shrine to the Roman god Jupiter on the site where the Holy Jewish Temple had once stood.
But he also chose to rename Judea with that of the hated ancient enemy of Israel; the now long extinct Philistines. This was done as a lasting insult to the Jewish people. Hadrian thus renamed the land Philistia, later Latinized into Palestina and, in time, becoming Palestine.
We should note that the Philistines were known as the “Sea Peoples” whom, it is believed, originated from Crete. They settled along much of the south eastern Mediterranean coastline and certainly had nothing to do with the ancestry of any Arabs — despite the deluded imaginings of the late arch terrorist, Yasser Arafat.    
The usage of the Hadrianic term, Palestine, was subsequently absorbed into the lexicon of the Church, which has continued to use the historically incorrect term, Palestine, when referring to biblical history in maps and literature: often replacing the word, Israel.
Interestingly, when the Crusader King Frederick II obtained a lease of much of the Holy Land from the Egyptian Sultan, Al-Kamil, including Bethlehem, Nazareth and Jerusalem, he called it the Kingdom of Jerusalem.
When Great Britain was awarded the Mandate for the territory in 1920 by the League of Nations, it immediately employed the term, Palestine, on both sides of the River Jordan.  
The British term became the geo-political usage for several decades and the Jewish community was obliged to use terms such as the Palestine Post for today’s Jerusalem Post and the Palestine Symphony Orchestra for today’s Israel Symphony Orchestra. The historically correct name, Israel, was finally revived after the reconstituted State of Israel proclaimed its independence in 1948.
No such place as Palestine existed in Christ’s time or at the time of the biblical Jewish Judges or Kings. The Jewish patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, never lived in a place called Palestine, nor did any of the biblical prophets. Canaan would be accurate for patriarchal times but the Canaanites, the Philistines, and a host of other pagan tribes had already long disappeared by later biblical times. Indeed, as we know, no independent state called Palestine has ever existed in recorded history, certainly not an Arab one. Palestine – like, for instance, Patagonia or Siberia – has always been merely a geographical area.  

So why use the term, Palestine, to describe a historical period and location when that word had not yet been invented?   
Surely the use by authors and bible commentators of a name that never existed until at least 135 AD can finally begin to be corrected.
After all, historical correctness must always trump political correctness.
  • The 8th article for consideration:

O, Palestine!

“Palestinian identity” then, as now, was negative, focused entirely on opposition to Zionists rather than a positive self-definition. Arab Palestinian leaders, like the mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husayni, an ardent supporter of the Nazis, and arch-terrorist Yasser Arafat — both “fathers” of Palestinianism ignored by Khalidi — rejected Zionism and promoted terrorism.
Local Arab uprisings against British rule were anti-colonial and anti-Zionist, not directed toward another independent Palestinian state. Arab riots and pogroms, like those in 1929 and 1936, for example, were not motivated by Palestinian nationalism; there were no calls for a Palestinian state. The battle cry was, “Kill the Jews.”

In 1946, Arab historian Philip Hitti testified before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry that “there is no such thing as Palestine in history.” In 1947, Arab leaders protesting the U.N. partition plan argued that Palestine was part of Syria and “politically, the Arabs of Palestine [were] not [an] independent[,] separate … political entity.”
In 1947, the U.N. proposed a “Jewish” State and an “Arab” — not Palestinian — State.
The womb of Palestinianism was war, the Nakba (catastrophe) in the Arab narrative, the establishment of the State of Israel. Five well-armed Arab countries invaded the nascent state, joining local Arab gangs and militias in a genocidal war to exterminate the Jews. Yet this was not seen as a war for Palestinian nationalism, or Palestinianism; it was an all-out Arab war against Jews, Zionism, and Zionists.  
Arab gangs that attacked Jews in 1948, composed of locals and Arabs from the region, were called the “Arab  — not Palestininian — Army of Liberation.” The reason is that prior to Israel’s establishment, the notion of a “Palestinian people” simply did not exist, or was irrelevant, because Arab affiliations are primarily familial and tribal — not national. And because “Palestinian” then meant something else.
Before 1948, those who were called (and called themselves) “Palestinians” were Jews, not Arabs, although both carried the same British passports. In fact, only after Jews in Palestine called themselves Israelis, in 1948, could Arabs adopt “Palestinian,” as theirs exclusively.  
The idea of an “Arab Palestinian people” was formed and enshrined in UNRWA “refugee camps” — today, large, developed towns — where its residents are indoctrinated with hatred, the “right of return” to Israel, and Israel’s eventual destruction. Except in Jordan, which granted them citizenship, the residents of these UNRWA towns in Lebanon and Syria are severely restricted and denied basic human and civil rights.
UNRWA’s controversial definition of “Arab refugee” includes anyone who claimed residence in Palestine since 1946, regardless of origin; this date is important because it marks the high point of a massive influx of Arabs from the region into Palestine, primarily due to employment opportunities and a higher standard of living. This category of “refugees,” moreover, was different from all others in that it included not only those who applied in 1949, but all of their descendants, forever, with full rights and privileges. This is one of the core issues preventing any resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict. UNRWA’s existence, therefore, perpetuates the conflict, prevents Israel’s acceptance, and breeds violence and terrorism.  
Ironically, only when Israel took control of Judea, Samaria, and Gaza could the residents of UNRWA towns in those areas move and work freely, obtain decent education and health care, and express a newly designed Palestinianism — albeit often dedicated to violence and Israel’s destruction.
Were it not for the policies of Arab countries and UNRWA, the “Arab refugees” might have followed the example of Jewish refugees who were expelled from Arab countries, came to Israel, and went on to live normal lives. Given the same chance, perhaps, Arab Palestinians might have established a state of their own. The desire to destroy Israel, however, trumps state-building, and it is fundamental to Palestinianism.              
The first attempt to define Palestinianism was in 1964, in the PLO Covenant, during Jordan’s occupation of “the West Bank” (a Jordanian reference from 1950 to distinguish the area from the East Bank of the Jordan River) and when Egypt held the Gaza Strip. On behalf of the “Palestinian Arab people,” the Covenant declared their goal: a “holy war” (jihad) to “liberate Palestine,” i.e. destroy Israel. There was no mention of Arabs living in “the West Bank” and Gaza Strip, since that would have threatened Arab rulers. Arab “refugees” were convenient proxies in the war against Israel, not their hosts; Palestinianism became a replacement nationalism for Zionism, a call to arms against Jews.
This balancing act was no longer necessary after 1967, when Israel acquired areas that had been originally assigned to a Jewish State by the League of Nations and British Mandate — Judea, Samaria, eastern Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip — and the Golan Heights, all rich in Jewish history and archeology. A year later, the PLO Covenant was amended to cover both “occupations” — in 1948 and 1967. 
Dedicated to armed struggle, their goal has never changed; unable to defeat Israel militarily, however, the Arab strategy is to demonize and delegitimize, creating yet another Arab Palestinian state in addition to Jordan. In order to accomplish this, they concocted a narrative, an identity, and an ethos to compete with Zionism and Jewish history: Palestinianism.
Presented in the PLO Covenant and Hamas Charter (1988), the purpose of Palestinianism is to “liberate Palestine” and destroy Israel; neither reflects any redeeming social or cultural values. Moreover, Palestinianism is moving towards Islamist extremism.
According to Palestinian Basic Law (Article 4), ratified by PA President Mohammed Abbas in 2005:
1. Islam is the official religion in Palestine. Respect for the sanctity of all other divine religions shall be maintained. 
2. The principles of Islamic Shari’a shall be a principal source of legislation.
3. Arabic shall be the official language.
“Palestinianism” lacks the basic requirements of legitimate national identity: a separate, unique linguistic, cultural, ethnic, or religious basis. It is nothing more than a political-military construct, currently led by Fatah and Hamas terrorist organizations. Yet it became legitimized by the U.N.  
Despite PLO mega-terrorist attacks, and backed by the Arab League, Muslim and “non-aligned” countries, the PLO was accepted by the United Nations in 1974. The following year, the U.N. passed its infamous “Zionism is Racism” resolution, sanctioning Israel’s demonization and setting the U.N. on a course of Israel’s destruction.
The myth of Palestinianism worked because the media accepted Arab and PLO claims and their cause. Nearly all media, for example, use the term “Palestinian” or “Israeli-occupied West Bank,” reinforcing Palestinian claims, rather than the authentic designation which appears on earlier maps, Judea and Samaria, which refer to the regions’ Jewish history. The use of “West Bank” is a political, not a geographic statement. 
Eventually, by the early 1990s, Palestinianism was accepted by some Israeli politicians, Left-dominated media, academia, cultural elite, and some jurists as a way of expressing their opposition to “settlements” and hoping for some sort of mutual recognition with the PLO. Their efforts culminated in the Oslo Accords (1993), which gave official Israeli sanction to Palestinianism.
Anti-Israel academics around the world promote “Palestinian” archeology, society, and culture as a brand name and a political message. Advertising works; every time someone uses the term “Palestinian,” it acknowledges and reinforces this myth.
Palestinianism, however, regardless of its lack of historical, cultural, and social roots, is now well-established and here to stay as a political identity that demands sovereign rights and a territorial base. The question seems to be not if, but where.  
The solution is regional. Arab Palestinians are entitled to civil and human rights in their host countries, where they have lived for generations. A second Arab Palestinian state, in addition to Jordan, which was carved out of Palestine in 1921 — whose population is two-thirds “Palestinian” — will not resolve any core issues at the heart of the conflict. The conflict is not territorial, but existential; recognition of a Jewish state — i.e., Israel — is anathema to the Palestinian cause. That explains why Palestinian Arab leaders refuse to accept it in any form.
The problem for Palestinianism is not “the occupation” in 1967, but Israel’s existence; seen as an exclusively Arab homeland, Palestine is an integral part of the Arab world, completely under Arab sovereignty. This is axiomatic; there are no exceptions and no compromises.      
Promoted in media, mosques, and schools, anti-Jewish incitement, denial of the Holocaust and Jewish history, and rejection of the right of Jewish national self-determination, by definition, Palestinianism is the greatest obstacle to peace.
Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • The 9th article to consider is:


Happy 63rd birthday, Israel

The Jewish community of Iran is one of the oldest in the Diaspora, and its historical roots reach back to the 6th century B.C.E., the time of the First Temple. Their history in the pre-Islamic period is intertwined with that of the Jews of neighboring Babylon. The Jewish colonies were scattered from centers in Babylon to Persian provinces and cities such as Hamadan and Susa. The books of EstherEzraNehemiah, and Daniel give a favorable description of the relationship of the Jews to the court of the Achaemids at Susa.

To this day, traditional Jews pray three times a day for the Temple’s restoration. During the centuries the Muslims controlled Palestine and two mosques were built on the site of the Jewish Temple. (This was no coincidence; it is a common Islamic custom to build mosques on the sites of other people’s holy places.) Since any attempt to level these mosques would lead to an international Muslim holy war (jihad) against Israel, the Temple cannot be rebuilt in the foreseeable future.

Here is a link to further writings by this author at AT (& there are more options under his name w/ other authors in the right-hand column at this link):


  • Here is the 10th article for consideration:

Muslim Brotherhood uses Holocaust to delegitimize Israel

For starters, by linking Israel’s national rights to the Holocaust, El-Erian seeks to depict the Jewish state as a latter-day colonial implant in the Holy Land, a refuge created by Europeans and Americans in the aftermath of the Holocaust. In so doing, he wipes out in one swoop a 3,000-year span of Jewish history, including Jewish rule in the land for nearly an entire millennium before the Roman conquest. And even after that conquest which sent many Jews into exile, there remained a continuous Jewish presence in the Holy Land for the next 2,000 years. Long before the Holocaust, Jews by the thousands and tens of thousands lived in dozens of Jewish communities across the Holy Land.

Compounding his perverted history, El-Erian also ignores the pre-Holocaust Balfour Declaration of 1917 when the British Government, anticipating victory in World War I and the breakup of the Ottoman Empire, called for the “establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.” Not a home for Jews, but a “national” home for Jews.

In turn, the Balfour Declaration was ratified and endorsed at the 1920 San Remo conference of the World War I victors. Two years later, the League of Nations similarly enshrined the Balfour Declaration in its approval of Britain’s Mandate in Palestine — a directive by the international community for Britian to establish a Jewish state in the Holy Land. That same year, the U.S. Congress also followed suit in endorsing the Balfour Declaration.

All these events took place before the Holocaust. What makes El-Erian’s Holocaust-Israel nexus so disturbing is that this isn’t just a myth propagated by radical Arab groups. It’s a lie that has seeped into Western academic and cultural circles — a fallacy that Arabs are the real indigenous people in the Holy Land — not the Jews who have a 3,000-year history there.

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • Here is the 11th article to consider:

Chris Wallace says Israel ‘Kicked Out’ Palestinians

The 1948 war began with Arab attacks the day the U.N. passed the partition resolution in November 1947, which was accepted by the Zionists, and rejected by the Arabs in mandate Palestine and the Arab nations.  The war escalated when 5 Arab armies invaded in May 1948 when the British withdrew, with a goal of wiping out the Jewish presence.  The most comprehensive histories of that period are in books by Benny Morris, and Efraim Karsh.  Wallace might want to read them.  About 600,000 Arabs abandoned homes in the war that went on for over a year.  Very few of them were kicked out  or driven out by the Zionists.

That did happen, but only in a few places. The great majority of the Arabs left due to other circumstances — fleeing a war zone where hand to hand close range fighting was going on, or because they were encouraged to do so by the invading Arab armies, telling them to come back to their homes after the Zionists were eliminated.  All the contemporary news accounts of the day, and statements by Arab leaders support this conclusion.
While this war was going on, an equal number of Jews in Arab countries — Yemen, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and other Arab countries — were driven from their homes and their countries.  Most of the Jewish refugees moved to Israel, and were accepted as full citizens.  None of them lingered in refugee camps for decades.  The treatment of the Arab refugees by Arab nations was different.  Many were never resettled, and many never obtained citizenship in their new countries.  Many were never allowed to work, but were forced to remain in stagnant camps, funded by the UNWRA, where indoctrination of future generations consisted mainly of blaming Israel for their plight.

Of the 600,000 original Arab refugees, perhap 75,000 are alive today.  Yet the Palestinians claim 5 million refugees.  They do this because alone among the refugee populations of the world, the U.N considers descendants of the original refugees, whether 2nd, 3rd, or 4th generation, as refugees, even though they never even set foot in Israel in their lives.  The Palestinians and Arab nations blame Israel for the plight of the refugees, but it is their cynical use of the refugee issue, that has kept alive a refugee population 63 years after a war, and embittered Palestinians from ever accepting a Jewish majority state of Israel.
The Palestinians want to flood Israel with five million “non-refugee refugees” in order to become a majority in Israel and change the character of the state.  All the so-called foreign policy experts who have looked at ways to resolve the conflict, and all the U.S. Presidents who have spoken about the issue, including Obama on several occasions, have argued that Palestinian refugees would need to be resettled in a new Palestinian state, or in Arab countries, or Western countries, with some compensation provided, assuming a two state solution that ended the conflict could be achieved.
Calling for a right of return to Israel is part of a strategy to end the Zionist state, the same strategy that created the refugee situation in the beginning.  There are consequences to starting wars and losing them.
Here is a link to more posts by this author at AT (there are more options of him writing with others in the right column at this link):
  • Here’s the 12th article for consideration:

Palestinian Identity Theft

Plundering Jewish history and claiming Israeli land is, of course, the raison d’être of Palestinian existence.  It is nothing new; Palestiniannational identity has always been built on the foundation of biblical and Zionist sources.  Shortly before the birth of the State of Israel, a prominent Arab historian conceded: “There is no such thing as Palestine in history.”

Without a history of their own, Palestinians have pillaged Jewish history to create an imaginary national narrative.  They cite the biblical Canaanites as their ancient ancestors and embrace Ishmael, born to Abraham’s servant Hagar, as their “biblical” forebear.  The “right of return” of Palestinian refugees, predictably, is modeled after the Israeli Right of Return extended to Jews everywhere by the Knesset in 1950.

Here is a link to further writings by this author at AT:

Are the Palestinian people really ‘invented’ as Gingrich claims?

I’ll not quote from him as his arguments are pretty lightweight & I’m more drawn to the Newt Gingrich remarks he quotes than his analysis of the same…
Here is a link to further writings by this author at AT:
  • Here’s the 14th article for consideration:

Wash. Post’s Palestinian propaganda falsifies history and the Bible

Greenberg’s formulation of 1948 as a “war that accompanied the creation of Israel,” is in sync with Palestinian propaganda that this was a Naqba — a Palestinian catastrophe due to Jews  claiming their nationhood — a myth that ignores the historic fact that it was Arab rejection of the two-state UN mandate that fostered the 1948 war.

In the same propagandistic vein, Greenberg  misreads and misrepresents history when he writes that the Dajani family’s decision to leave in January, 1948, four months before Israel’s Declaration of Independence, was “part of a mass Palestinian exodus, supposed to be temporary until the hostilities died down, but became a lifelong exile.”

Again, Greenberg jettisons factual history by failing to tell readers that the family left  before Israel’s creation because, with many thousands of other Arabs, they were urged in Arab radio broadcasts to decamp and get out of the way of an Arab military offensive to wipe out the Jewish state and then return to an Arab-ruled single state in what had been British Mandate Palestine — despite repeated pleas by Israeli leaders to stay put and become citizens with full civil and political rights in the new Israel.

With Greenberg, the sad tale of the Dajani family is turned into Palestinian victimhood rather than the outcome of massive self-inflicted wounds by Arab leaders.  The 1948 debacle was caused entirely by Arab rejectionism, not by Israel’s creation.

Not content to engage in revisionist history, Greenberg goes on to revise the Bible as well — again to suit Palestinian mythology.

He quotes Omar, the surviving family son, as remarking at the dedication of the square, while “choking back tears, that he hoped the day’s events would be “an example to the two peoples, descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Ishmael, to whom God promised this land.”

Sorry, Omar, but God did NOT promise “this land” equally to Isaac, the son of Abraham and Sarah, and to Ishmael, the son of Abraham and  his concubine, Hagar.  The Bible couldn’t be clearer that “this land,” i.e. Israel, was solely the inheritance of Isaac and his descendants.

As is told in Chapter 25 of Genesis, verses 5 and 6:  When Abraham neared death, he “gave all that he had unto Isaac. But unto the sons of the concubines (including Hagar), that Abraham had, Abraham gave gifts, and he sent them away from Isaac, his son, while he yet lived, eastward unto the east country (i.e. Arabia).

In other words, the Biblical Holy Land was promised exclusively to Isaac and his descendants.  At the same time, Ishmael was given great gifts, including inheritance of lands elsewhere for “12 princes according to their nations,” as we read in verse 15 of Chapter 25.

The Bible couldn’t be clearer about the political separation of Abraham’s two sons.  Each was to reign over his own nation.  Call it the Biblical version of the two-state solution.

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • The 15th article to consider is:

Where is Palestine?

Palestine, variously known in history as Canaan, Judaea, Eretz Yisrael, Filastin, and Syria Palaestina, has long been a malleable geographical entity.  Renamed by its successive Canaanite, Israelite, Roman, Christian, Mamluk, Muslim, Ottoman, and British conquerors, it became the revered “Holy Land” to 19th-century Western visitors.

World War I transformed geographical nomenclature.  On November 2, 1917, British Foreign Secretary Lord James Balfour issued his famous declaration proclaiming his government’s approval for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.”  But where was “Palestine”?

After violent Arab riots during 1920-21, the British government attempted to mollify infuriated opponents of a “Jewish Palestine.”  Winston Churchill, British secretary of state for the colonies, offered reassurance that the Balfour Declaration did not contemplate “that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a home should be founded in Palestine.”

If not “Palestine as a whole,” then where?  The League of Nations Mandate for Palestine, approved in July 1924, provided contradictory answers.  Article 6 assured “close settlement by Jews on the land” defined as Palestine.  But Article 25 retracted that assurance.  In convoluted language, it declared: “In the territories lying between the Jordan [River] and the eastern boundary of Palestine as ultimately determined, the Mandatory shall be entitled, with the consent of the Council of the League of Nations, to postpone or withhold application of such provisions of the Mandate as he may consider inapplicable to the existing local conditions.”

In translation: “Palestine” was redefined to mean only the land west of the Jordan River, approximately one-quarter of “Palestine as a whole.”  The remaining three-quarters were bestowed upon the Hashemite Sheikh Abdullah, son of the Emir of Mecca, for his role in the wartime Arab revolt against Ottoman rule.  His kingdom would become known as Trans-Jordan.

But there was also good news for the Zionist cause.  Between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean, Jews enjoyed the internationally guaranteed right of “close settlement” — without geographical distinction between the coastal plain stretching from Gaza to Haifa, the mountain ridge of Judea and Samaria, or the Jordan Valley west of the River.  No limits were imposed on the right of Jews to settle in their modern cities of Tel Aviv and Haifa, or their ancient cities of Hebron and Jerusalem — or even the Gaza area, where Jews had lived for centuries.

Although the League of Nations expired in 1945, its successor, the United Nations, incorporated in its Charter protection for Jewish settlement rights.  Article 80, drafted by Jewish representatives and known as the “Palestine clause,” explicitly protected the rights of “any peoples” under “the terms of existing international instruments to which members of the United Nations may respectively be parties.”  It thereby reaffirmed the right of “close settlement” by Jews throughout the land west of the Jordan River.  That right has never been abrogated.

For a time, even prominent local Arabs affirmed “Palestine” as Zionist territory.  Testifying before the British Peel Commission in 1937, a Syrian leader asserted: “There is no such country as Palestine. … Our country was for centuries part of Syria.”  Palestinian Arabs continued to identify with Greater Syria and “the larger Arab people.”  Shortly before the birth of the State of Israel, Arab historian Philip Hitti conceded: “There is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not.”  A PLO military commander subsequently acknowledged: “There are no differences between Jordanians, Palestinian, Syrians and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation.”

Without a history to call their own, Palestinians have relentlessly plundered Jewish history to compensate for their missing past.  So it is that their biblical “forebears” became the Canaanites; the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, site of the ancient Jewish Temples, is their “third”-holiest site, after Mecca and Medina; Me’arat haMachpelah, built over the burial places of the Jewish patriarchs and matriarchs in Hebron, is a mosque; and their Gaza flotillas are modeled on the famous Jewish refugee ship Exodus.

Where, exactly, might another Palestinian state arise?  “Another,” because Jordan, constituting two-thirds of Mandatory Palestine, with a Palestinian majority population, already is a de facto Palestinian state.  By any test of history or demography, Jordan is Palestine.  Gaza is a Palestinian Hamas fiefdom sworn to Israel’s destruction.  That makes two Palestinian states.  Should any part of the West Bank ever become a Palestinian state, it will make three.  That may be at least one too many.

Here is a link to further writings by this author at AT:
  • Here is the 16th article for consideration:


Brutal Realism About the Middle East

I won’t directly quote this article which is harsh & broad in it’s scope of criticism of the history of the Middle East, mostly an indictment of Islam, & not really illuminating the “Palestinian” problem overtly.  It does help clarify the Muslim mindset regarding Israel & the West & is worth reading however…

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • Here is the 17th article to consider:

NYT Peddles U.N. Propaganda about Palestinia​n Refugees

Nowhere in her article, however, does Kershner mention that there would have been no Palestinian refugee problem if the Arabs had accepted the 1947 U.N. two-state partition plan, calling for creation of an Arab state and a Jewish state. Israel accepted partition. Arabs rejected it and instead launched an all-out war against the nascent Jewish state with the avowed aim of destroying it.

Nor does Kershner mention that some 800,000 Jews who had lived for centuries in Arab lands were mercilessly persecuted by their host countries about the same time and forced to flee and become refugees as well. Jewish refugees numbered more than Palestinian refugees. But Jewish plight doesn’t grab the New York Times as much.

Neither does Kershner point out that these Jewish refugees were integrated into Israel, the United States and other countries, unlike Palestinian refugees who were — and still are — used as political pawns to undergird Arab and Palestinian calls for a “right of return” to Israel for an estimated 5 million Palestinian refugees and their descendants.
As for the impact of the 1967 Six-Day War, there is no mention that whatever happened to Palestinians, it was Egypt and Syria that precipitated the conflict, again with the avowed aim of annihilating the Jewish state.

In other words, history shows that the Palestinian refugee problem is a self-made, self-inflicted phenomenon which need never have happened.

Kershner, however, is not interested in real history. Instead, she join UNRWA in a transparent anti-Israel propaganda campaign to validate Palestinian victimhood at the expense of Israel’s basic legal and historical right to its very existence.


Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • The 18th article to consider is:


The Land is not the Issue


Call them Arab-Israelis, Palestinians, Fakistinians, whatever. The Arabs are the issue, not the real estate.

Can anyone doubt that if in 1967 Israel conquered an empty — or even sparsely populated — Judea and Samaria that Israel would have annexed it in five minutes? Can anyone doubt that had Israel annexed such an empty Judea and Samaria the world’s outcry would have faded out over time?

In 1967, Israel immediately annexed the eastern half of the formerly divided Jerusalem for religious and historical reasons. The Golan Heights was annexed in 1981 for security reasons. The Arabs in both areas were, and still are, offered citizenship. But the populations in the Golan and Jerusalem were small enough to absorb, at least initially. Most of the Arabs in Jerusalem refused the offer, as did most of the Druze in the Golan.

What has kept the issue alive are the Arabs in Judea and Samaria. The world is bombarded constantly with images of hostile Arabs who do not want to be under an Israeli rule — where they have no vote — whether that rule is direct rule, as in Area C of Judea and Samaria, or indirect rule as in Area A, or under controlled sea borders as in the Gaza Strip.

A history of Israel from the start of the Mandate until today shows how determined the Jews are to keep every inch of land under Jewish control. In 1937 when the Peel Commission offered the Jews a take or leave it partition of the land, Ben Gurion begrudgingly only accepted the concept of partition. The Jews rejected the Peel Commission’s partition even though such rejection meant cutting off Jewish immigration from a Nazi-influenced Europe.

No Jew alive today has the authority to yield any piece of Land whatsoever. This right is preserved by the Jewish People throughout the generations and can[n]ot be forfeited under any circumstance. — Ben Gurion

Call it wise parlaying or dishonest dissemblance. Israel will negotiate till the cows come home; but will not surrender Judea and Samaria. This is what Israel perceives as her divinely given homeland. This attitude informs the Israeli leadership today. Israel will never give the Arabs in Judea and Samaria independence. Never.

We would like this [Palestine] to be an entity which is less than a state. — Yitzhak Rabin

At best, Israel will offer the Arabs an insultingly very limited degree of controlled autonomy.

Israeli groups, such as Women in Green, are arguing for total annexation with a restricted vote for the Arabs in Judea and Samaria — only those who meet the criteria.

So the issue is not the land. Israel is not going to give up an inch of it willingly; and no Palestinian will accede to anything less that total independence. Nothing short of a nuclear war will get Israel to surrender her patrimony. Call it heroic wisdom, the greatest display of courage since the Spartan Stand at Thermopylae, or call it something nasty, Israel will not budge.

This leaves us in the rest of the world with an image of 2 million Arabs in Judea and Samaria who want to be out from under Israeli oversight, who are tired of Israeli checkpoints and property confiscations.

One could suggest more negotiations. The Israelis will happy to talk for another hundred years, while planting more Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria. One would have thought by now that American foreign policy would have figured this out. The Arabs have not stopped their calls for the destruction of Israel. What is there to negotiate?

The only humane solution is to get the Arabs out of the area.

It is easy to say: Let them go to the other 22 Arab states; but that is dishonest. The Arab states refuse to naturalize Palestinians. To get the Arab states to take them would require a massive coordinated Western pressure campaign; and even that is not guaranteed to work. The Arabs may just realign themselves with China and ignore Western pressure. Though it is worth a try.

Putting aside who is right, and who is wrong, the Arabs and Jews cannot live together. That should be obvious.

What should be negotiated is how to get the Arabs out of Judea and Samaria peacefully, who should pay for the relocation, and where should they go.

I have some sympathy for the Palestinian predicament, but no other solution is possible.

Instead of subsidizing the Arabs to stay; pay them to leave.

The land is not the issue.

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • Here is the 19th article for consideration:

Passover, the Temple Mount, and Jewish Sovereignty

Jeff Daube, Israeli Office Director of the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) believes that “unfettered access and freedom to pray at a holy site is a basic, universally recognized right, which certainly should be accorded to Jews in the Jewish State of Israel.” Daube sees this as guaranteed under Israeli law. “We have to assert our rights wherever they are threatened. The Temple Mount is the last place on Earth where Jews should tolerate this type of discrimination.”

In February 2014, for the first time in Israel’s history, more than 30 MK’s met to discuss the loss of Israeli sovereignty on the Mount. It stirred up the Arab world. Soon after, there were violent disturbances which Daube believes were provoked and directed by the Palestinian Authority. He says this behavior is “animated and exacerbated by more than four decades of Israel’s refusal to assert its own sovereignty and rights there.”

Israeli citizens have been educated to yearn for engagement with God in prayer at the Western Wall rather than on the Temple Mount. During the week of Passover, thousands of Jews participate in the Birkat Kohanim ceremony at the Wall. The traditional Aaronic Benediction is said and the House of Israel is blessed. Israelis seem satisfied conducting the ceremony at the Wall and not on the Mount.

According to Daube, “There’s a question about exactly where the Jewish Temple’s Holy of Holies had been situated. That is hallowed ground which only the High Priest on Yom Kippur could walk on. Any Jew walking there is in violation, even if unknowingly, and many believe that carries a heavenly death penalty. While the ultra-Orthodox have taken the position that Jews may enter the Temple Mount area only once the Messiah comes, more and more religious nationalist rabbis have suggested Jews are permitted to walk everywhere on the Mount except where the Dome of the Rock stands – which they think is the Holy of Holies site. These rabbis encourage Jews to visit the Temple Mount often.”

Yet, they are not allowed to pray there. They are not even allowed to move their lips in prayer without being ousted by Muslim authorities.

This Passover, Jews, along with Christians, can expect the Israeli police to keep them off the Mount rather than deal with another round of Muslim disturbances.

Several MK’s recently visited the Mount, to the dismay of Palestinians and Jordanians who claimed it was an Israeli effort to take over. But, Daube explains this is a Muslim excuse for violence, as in the case of former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s visit to the Mount in 2000.

“The rocks, already on the Temple Mount, had been made ready for us. Faisal Husseini, among others, had already planned the ‘outbreak’. The same thing is happening now. As there is growing talk in pro-religious rights circles of finding a modus vivendi for joint prayer, and as the negotiations wind down, the PA is looking for another pretext to blame the Israelis.”

In 1967, Jewish soldiers liberated the Temple Mount from the Jordanians, and Jerusalem was united again. Under Israeli control, the soldiers said the Hallel (Prayer of Praise) because the Mount and East Jerusalem were, miraculously, given into their hands. Under international pressure, and fearing it would ignite a major Middle East war, Israeli leader Moshe Dayan gave the keys of control back to the WAQF.  To date, the WAQF, also known as the Jordanian Religious Trust, does not allow anyone but Muslims to pray on the Mount.

Legally, access to holy places is a right guaranteed by Israeli law, but the law isn’t being implemented. The ZOA explains that after the Six Day War, the Israeli Knesset passed an amendment to the Law and Administration Ordinance, extending Israeli sovereignty to Jerusalem’s eastern sector, including the Old City and the Temple Mount. Furthermore, the Knesset passed the Safeguarding of the Holy Places Law meant to protect freedom of access to the Mount by members of religious denominations.

Today, the WAQF identifies visitors and singles out Jews for biased treatment. Muslims are treated with respect and with no discrimination. The ZOA says the Israeli government is more willing to meet the extremist demands of the WAQF, than consider the legal rights of all its citizens.

The Temple Mount has always been the holiest site in Jewish history. In contrast, for Muslims it is Islam’s third holiest site, not its first. Israeli MK’s are frustrated with the status quo. They want the government to stop abdicating its authority. They refuse to accept that Jews are banned from the most intimate place of prayer before God.

Since the 1980s, Muslims on the Mount have persisted in getting rid of Jewish artifacts in an effort to delegitimize Jewish ties to the holy site and East Jerusalem. Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) reported in March 2014, inflammatory remarks by the PA Minister of Religious Affairs. He claimed Israel was planning to remove the Al-Aqsa Mosque from the Temple Mount. The PMW also reported that Palestinian religious leaders want more limitations to Jewish prayers, claiming only Palestinians have the right to access the Al-Aqsa Mosque and its surroundings, and Jews should no longer pray at the Western Wall.  In 2012, Abbas suggested Israel’s actions in Jerusalem were to take over Muslim and Christian holy sites. This Palestinian libel has been actively promoted since the 1990s.

Daube insists, “The PA never has prepared the Palestinian street or the Arab world to respect the facts of Jewish history, or the sanctity of Jewish holy places, because that would mean having to recognize Israel as the nation state of the Jewish People. What is new is that Israel now has been forced to confront its revisionist adversary on the world stage, where the Palestinians have been offered a bully pulpit to promote their historically absurd narrative.”

What could change the current scenario is an order from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu demanding the police crackdown on Muslim violence, while at the same time, allowing Jews up on the Mount during holy days. Netanyahu could take further action permitting Jews and Christians to pray on the Mount without fear of Muslim reprisals.

Holding to the status quo, the Israeli government is undermining one of the greatest outcomes of the Six Day War — the Old City and the Temple Mount once again under Jewish sovereignty. That sovereignty, along with Israel’s sovereignty over other parts of the homeland, is under scrutiny. If Israeli leaders would exercise Israel’s rights to its biblical sites, perhaps, there would be greater respect in the global community for Israel’s historical claim of being the nation state of the Jewish People.

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:

  • Here is the 20th article to consider:

Israel and the West’s Submission to Islam

The discourse of peace surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conundrum remains as divorced from morality and reality as could ever be imagined in this lopsided political universe. The laws of sociology and the lessons of history make the two-state solution a non-starter. After 47 years, the settlement map of Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria, their size and spread, preempt an Israeli withdrawal to the pre-1967 armistice lines. The idea of a Palestinian state over all of the territory is not in the demographic and geographic cards. Moreover, the embedded friction between the Jews and the Arabs, after so much bloodshed, enmity, and mistrust, is a visible obstacle to a mutually satisfactory agreement between them on all outstanding issues – borders and refugees, water and security, and Jerusalem. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is intractable and unsolvable according to the current modalities of proposed peace-making.

A frenzied Muslim fanaticism has galvanized the dormant emotional energies of an Islam bedeviled by old memories (like the Caliphate) and sectarian (Sunni-Shiite) divisions, always with a profound disdain for non-Muslims unworthy of life and dignity. The swirl of Islamic warfare began in Afghanistan and Pakistan, passed through Khomeini’s Iranian Islamic theocracy, penetrated northern Iraq and threatens Baghdad, took hold in eastern Syria, already with appeal and a foothold in Lebanon, Jordan, and Israel.

Meanwhile Europe lives in denial, paralyzed by multiculturalism and national self-immolation, hypnotized by the dogma of human rights, guilt-ridden by its colonial past, and hoping to mollify Muslims on their streets and neighborhoods by offering up the sacrifice of Christians and Jews in the Middle East to the Islamic god of wrath. But Islam seeks world conquest that includes the West as well.

What the Europeans ignore about the Arab-Israeli conflict and the long war is the precedent of 1948. When the Arabs attacked, and the West militarily embargoed Israel, the Zionists yet won a compelling victory in their ancient homeland; and a half a million Arabs became refugees, never to return. In 1967, the Arabs again declared their goal to be the annihilation of Israel; but Israel won, and another quarter of a million Arabs fled the country.

In 2014 the same scenario is unfolding. Pushed to the wall by Europeans who overlook and justify escalating domestic Arab violence and provocations, Israel will sooner or later need to unleash a severe response against the Muslims in the country who deny the right of Israel to exist, at all, and certainly as a Jewish and Zionist state. Newton’s political physics teach us that an action produces a reaction, and Hegel’s dialectics charted how a thesis leads to an antithesis, culminating in a new, rarely anticipated, synthesis. All this fondling of the Palestinians and coddling of Islam is putting in place a horrific threat to Israel, which may however evoke a welcome opportunity for deliverance and triumph.

Are we not passing through a very momentous period of history: with signs of the political decline and social decadence of Europe and the West, the clash between Israel and Islam, between Islam and Christianity, and with attendant results that could change the political — and religious — map of the world? The cutting edge of history is the crossroads we now face.    

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • Here’s the 21st article to consider:

Islam and the ‘Great Religions’

I’m not going to quote from this article for it is more focused on Islam & it’s problems historically & morally.  It is worth reading to get some insight into distortions found within Islam, including justifying a “Palestinian” state/history…

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • Here is the 22nd article for consideration:

Independence and Identity: What Israel Knows, Europe Has Forgotten, and America May Yet Remember

Every nation needs to find its own path to instill identity in its people and an understanding of why it is worth preserving.  In Israel’s case, as fractious as society may be, it has utilized several tools to forge its strong sense of common identity.  Through maintaining a strong Jewish historical memory and reconnecting to an ancient homeland; through breathing new life into its historic, though largely dormant, Hebrew language; through ingathering of exiles and rescue of persecuted Jews around the world; and through surviving crises together against often daunting odds, the Jewish people have re-created the nation of Israel.  Infighting aside, there is a widespread sense of shared fate and a still potent recollection of pre-state Jewish powerlessness.  Reinforced through common tradition, education, and ceremony – including Yom Hazikaron and Yom Ha’atzmaut – that powerful identity has kept Israelis together through some dangerous, trying times.

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:


  • This is the 23rd article to consider:

The Opposite of a Two-State Solution Is Not One State

I’m not going to quote this article for it focuses on more recent history & proposes a 2 state solution between Israel & Jordan.  It is interesting reading however…
Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT, & she also writes with Stephen Bryen, the link can be found in the right-hand column at the below link:


  • Here is the 24th article to consider:

The Conservatives Who Resurrected Israel

On November 2, 1917, exactly 100 years ago, British foreign secretary Lord Arthur Balfour sent a private letter to Lord Walter Rothschild, the second Baron Rothschild.  The letter was written not by Balfour, but by other ministers in Lloyd George’s Cabinet – Lord Alfred Milner and Leopold Amery.  In history, this letter became known as the Balfour Declaration.

Both Balfour and Milner were true Britons.  Rothschild was proud of being a Jew.  Amery was a Jew who carefully concealed his Jewish origins.  What united this quartet?

All of them were, of course, to some degree, Zionists, but only to the extent that such was in the interests of the British Empire.  Otherwise, the Declaration would never have happened.

The main thing is that they were all members of the Conservative Party of the United Kingdom.

Lord Walter Rothschild descended from the famous family of Rothschild bankers.  He was a Conservative member of the British Parliament from 1899 to 1910.  Many years before receiving the letter from Balfour, Baron Rothschild withdrew from political and banking activities and became a famous zoologist.  Nevertheless, he was the one chosen by the British government to disclose its decision to allocate part of the territory of the Ottoman Empire to the Jewish state.

The decisive meeting of the Cabinet was held on October 31, 1917.  Most Cabinet members supported the idea of the Declaration.  The recognized world leader of the Zionists, future first president of Israel, Chaim Weizmann, was informed immediately after the vote as he waited for a decision in the lobby.  But the Cabinet chose a very English method to publicize its historic decision – in the form of a private letter to the leader of the British Jewish diaspora, Walter Rothschild.

The leader of the opposition to the Declaration was Edwin Montagu – one of the few Jews in the British government, and one of the most radical left-wing politicians in the United Kingdom.  Montague did not take part in the meeting on October 31 because he was traveling to India to assume the post of secretary of state in the colonial administration.  Perhaps Edwin Montagu is a founding father of a strange leftist cult of Jewish anti-Zionists, which exists in many countries to this day.

Of course, the British government had no right to dispose of the lands of the Ottoman Empire in 1917.  The war was still going on, and the official division of the territory of the Ottoman Empire had not yet occurred.  But the British were in a hurry, and for a good reason.  They forestalled a similar declaration from the German Cabinet by just a few months (hat tip: Daniel Kluger).

Despite this, all the Allied countries supported the idea of ​​creating a Jewish state on the territory where no one doubted the claims of the Jews to the land.

The Balfour Declaration was approved by the Allies at a conference in San Remo (Article 4) in April 1920.  Then, in August of the same year, it was included in the text of the Treaty of Sevres (Article 95) between the victorious Allies and the defeated Ottoman Empire.  The Balfour Declaration received full international legal status after it was included in the text of the decision of the League of Nations on the British Mandate in 1922.

Although the United States was not a member of the League of Nations at that time, the 67th U.S. Congress in 1922 adopted the Lodge-Fisch resolution (both Republicans) proclaiming support for the Balfour Declaration, and President Harding (also a Republican) signed it.  The resolution was so popular that both the House of Representatives and the Senate adopted it by a simple voice vote.  Republicans in the 67th Congress had a significant advantage: they occupied about two thirds of all the seats.

In 1932, marking the fifteenth anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, Republican President Herbert Hoover reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to the principles of creating a national home for Jews in the Holy Land.

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • The 25th article to consider is:

Israel at 70: Time to Retire the False Palestinian Narrative

During World War 2, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, holed up in Berlin, encouraged Adolf Hitler to turn his death machine against the Jews in Palestine while the Nazis were working to murder all the Jews in Europe.  During the British mandate period, the Arabs had rejected earlier partition plans more favorable  to them, such as the 1938 Peel Plan, because it allowed a tiny Jewish state to be created.  In essence, the Arabs had fought Zionism for half a century, and were determined to deal t he Jewish state a knockout blow as soon the British left in May 1948.

Five Arab nations attacked Israel the day it became a new nation,  assisting the Arabs in Palestine in their effort to destroy Israel.  Despite enormous advantages  in armed men, planes, tanks, and other weaponry, the Arabs were unsuccessful. Israel survived the onslaught, and defeated the Arab armies , creating new borders for the Jewish state, as well as for Jordan and Egypt. At the end of the war, Jordan held Judea and Samaria (also known as the West Bank) and the eastern part of Jerusalem, including the old city, and expelled Jews who had lived there for thousands of years. Egypt  captured Gaza in the war. At no point did Egypt and Jordan attempt to create a new Arab state of Palestine with the territories they had picked up in the war.  Instead Jordan annexed the West Bank, a seizure recognized by only two nations, and Egypt held Gaza as a territory.

During the war, there were many people displaced on both sides.  More than half a million Arabs became refugees. Most of them had left their towns as instructed by invading  Arab armies to get out of the way of the coming planned slaughter of the Jews. Tens of thousands had left even before the UN partition resolution. Some fled a war zone, where there was very close fighting, a sensible thing to do. In some cases, the Israeli forces consolidated territorial corridors, particularly to Jerusalem.  The Arabs also spread stories of civilian killings, which frightened many Arab residents to leave their towns, even though the stories were false or greatly exaggerated.

After the war, the Arabs demanded that the partition borders be restored, and all the refugees be allowed to return.  This was a novel demand. If you start a war meaning to annihilate the enemy and you lose, you don’t get a do over.  There are no do overs in history. The smart thing would have been for the Arabs to have accepted the partition plan and not started a war. There are consequences to starting a war and losing.

The Syrian Prime Minister during the war of 1948-1949, Haled Al Azm, wrote in his memoirs in 1973:

“Since 1948 we have been demanding the return of the refugees to their homes. But we ourselves are the ones who encouraged them to leave. Only a few months separated our call for them to leave and our appeal to the United Nations to resolve on their return.”

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas wrote in 1976:

“The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate, and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettoes in which the Jews used to live.”

This is the real tragedy of the Palestinian Arabs.  Those who left their homes wound up not far from home, in Arab countries which had supported their cause during the war. They were among other Arabs, who spoke the same language, had the same culture, and the same religion.  No refugee population should have had it easier, given that Arabs wound up among their own people.  But  the Arab countries refused to allow normal resettlement, as usually occurs with refugees, instead relegating many refugees to squalid camps, in which their families have lived now for 3 or 4 generations.  Many Palestinians have chosen to  remain in these camps  dreaming  of a return to Israel, clanging old keys from 70 years back, or been threatened if they wanted to leave.  But how can you “return” to a place where you have never lived or even visited? The truth of the matter is that  there may be no more than 25,000 refugees remaining alive from the 1948 war. The rest are descendants — children, grandchildren even great grandchildren of original refugees, none of whom have been in Israel or left it.

All the refugee populations in the world come under the jurisdiction of a single UN agency, except for  the Palestinians. All other refugees do not pass refugee status on to descendants, only the refugees themselves are counted as such. Only the Palestinians are allowed to count all descendants  as refugees, and many have chosen to live off their collective grievance, rather than move on with their lives.

Sephardic Jews,  more than 800,000 of whom were expelled or encouraged to leave Arab countries in the years after the creation of Israel, provide a far better  and more humane approach for dealing with refugees. Israel absorbed more than 70 per cent of these  refugees (France and the United States took many others) and within a few short years, had moved them out of temporary housing and allowed them to start new lives in Israel.  I know because my father and his 4 brothers and parents left all of their lives and assets behind when they fled from Iraq and they made themselves a new life in Israel.

Here is a link to further articles by this author at AT:
  • Here is the 26th & final article to consider:

At Last, A Realistic Look at the Israeli-‘Palestinian’ Conflict

But there is no area of national and international discussion so rife with rigidly enforced propaganda falsehoods than the conflict between Israel and the so-called “Palestinians.” In The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process, the historian and scholar of Islam Robert Spencer clears away the lies.

And there are so very many lies to clear away. The Palestinian Delusion begins by exploding the common modern-day claim that the Israelis are descendants of Europeans who have ties to the Middle East that are largely mythical at worst and far-distant ancient history at best. Spencer marshals a large body of evidence to show that not only were Jews always living in the land that is today the state of Israel, without interruption even after the Romans expelled them in the year 134, but that the Arab presence there began considerably later and was always sparse. In fact, the presence of Muslim Arabs in the geographical region known as Palestine only began to increase significantly after Zionist leaders began to exhort Jews to return to their ancestral homeland. With the Jews came jobs and opportunity; many, if not most, of the people known today as “Palestinians” only came to that area when it started to be settled by Jews in great numbers. Spencer proves this by reference to the names of the “Palestinians” themselves, which all too often betray an origin somewhere else.

The second great myth that The Palestinian Delusion explodes is that “Palestine” was ever the name of anything more than a geographical region. The claims that Israel is occupying “Palestinian” land are predicated on the assumption that there ever was Palestinian land in the first place. Spencer briskly traces the history of the region, showing that while the Romans renamed it Palestine, there never was a nation of Palestine at all, and the land that is supposed to be occupied by Israel today was actually designated by the League of Nations (and confirmed by the United Nations) to be the site of a Jewish national home. No one rightly owns “the West Bank” (another propagandistic neologism; it’s Judea and Samaria) and Gaza except Israel.

Spencer shows in shocking detail how Sadat was anything but the wise, courageous man of peace that he has become in international legend since the Camp David accords were concluded. As a young officer in the Egyptian army, he even wrote a love letter to Hitler — and his subsequent career shows that his overtures to Israel were motivated solely by a desire to obtain through negotiations what he could not get on the battlefield. Jimmy Carter was a willing, even eager stooge in this enterprise, and the “peace process” was underway.

Here are links to further articles by this author at AT:
Here is a bonus American Thinker author, who I have not quoted in this post but pretty much anything she writes is worth reading!


Well there is Plenty of material to digest in these excepts, let alone in the complete articles if you choose to dig in that deeply.  Obviously this is an exceedingly complex issue & can be examined from numerous fronts.  The focus of the articles searched for & shared was more along the lines of the historical aspects of the conflicts surrounding Israel’s modern existence & state & trying to illuminate the historicity (or lack thereof) of the so-called Palestinians.

Given the material shared in this post it is surely possible to make a strong case for both the Biblical & historical claims of Jews & Israeli’s to the land wherein sits the modern nation of Israel…& to the supported claim for their right to further land masses in some of the surrounding areas, as promised to them by God in scripture & man in the early 20th century at a minimum.

I hope you have found this collection of details about Israel & “Palestine” helpful.

God Bless You & thanks for stopping by…

See the source image

fyi images are from various image searches at Bing.com unless otherwise attributed

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s